Current:Home > FinanceCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -WealthSpot
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
View
Date:2025-04-27 02:36:23
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- New childhood obesity guidance raises worries over the risk of eating disorders
- Why hundreds of doctors are lobbying in Washington this week
- How grown-ups can help kids transition to 'post-pandemic' school life
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Here are the 15 most destructive hurricanes in U.S. history
- Why Lizzo Says She's Not Trying to Escape Fatness in Body Positivity Message
- Woman arrested after allegedly shooting Pennsylvania district attorney in his office
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- The Marburg outbreak in Equatorial Guinea is a concern — and a chance for progress
Ranking
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Hispanic dialysis patients are more at risk for staph infections, the CDC says
- 13 Things to Pack if You're Traveling Alone for a Safe, Fun & Relaxing Solo Vacation
- Johnny Depp Arrives at Cannes Film Festival 2023 Amid Controversy
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Some electric vehicle owners say no need for range anxiety
- New childhood obesity guidance raises worries over the risk of eating disorders
- Taylor Lautner “Praying” for John Mayer Ahead of Taylor Swift’s Speak Now Re-Release
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
How a New White House Memo Could Undermine Science in U.S. Policy
Shoppers Can’t Get Enough of This Sol de Janeiro Body Cream and Fragrance With 16,800+ 5-Star Reviews
Global Warming Is Pushing Arctic Toward ‘Unprecedented State,’ Research Shows
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
Coal’s Steep Decline Keeps Climate Goal Within Reach, Report Says
Avatar Editor John Refoua Dead at 58
Is Climate Change Urgent Enough to Justify a Crime? A Jury in Portland Was Asked to Decide