Current:Home > InvestJudge delays Trump’s hush-money criminal trial until mid-April, citing last-minute evidence dump -WealthSpot
Judge delays Trump’s hush-money criminal trial until mid-April, citing last-minute evidence dump
View
Date:2025-04-17 13:47:46
NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump’s New York hush-money criminal trial was delayed Friday until at least mid-April as the judge seeks answers about a last-minute evidence dump that the former president’s lawyers said has hampered their ability to prepare their defense.
Manhattan Judge Juan Manuel Merchan agreed to a 30-day delay starting Friday and scheduled a hearing for March 25 after Trump’s lawyers complained that they only recently started receiving more than 100,000 pages of documents from a previous federal investigation into the matter.
Merchan said he is holding the hearing to determine if prosecutors should face sanctions or if the case should be dismissed, as Trump’s lawyers have requested.
The trial had been scheduled to start on March 25. The delay means the trial would start no earlier than April 15. Prosecutors had said they wouldn’t object to a short delay.
In a letter Friday, Merchan told Manhattan prosecutors and Trump’s defense team that he wanted to assess “who, if anyone, is at fault for the late production of the documents,” whether it hurt either side and whether any sanctions are warranted.
The judge demanded a timeline of events detailing when the documents were requested and when they were turned over. He also wants all correspondence between the Manhattan district attorney’s office, which is prosecuting Trump, and the U.S. attorney’s office, which previously investigated the matter in 2018.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined comment. Trump lawyer Todd Blanche also declined comment.
Merchan’s decision upended what had been on track to be the first of Trump’s four criminal indictments to go to trial. Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee, has fought to delay all of his criminal cases, arguing that he shouldn’t be forced into a courtroom while he should be on the campaign trial.
Trump’s lawyers wanted a 90-day delay, which would’ve pushed the start of the trial into the early summer, and asked Merchan to dismiss the case entirely. Prosecutors said they were OK with a 30-day adjournment “in an abundance of caution and to ensure that defendant has sufficient time to review the new materials.”
Trump’s lawyers said they have received tens of thousands of pages of evidence in the last two weeks from the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, which investigated the hush money arrangement while Trump was president.
The evidence includes records about former Trump lawyer-turned-prosecution witness Michael Cohen that are “exculpatory and favorable to the defense,” Trump’s lawyers said. Prosecutors said most of the newly turned over material is “largely irrelevant to the subject matter of this case,” though some records are pertinent.
The hush money case centers on allegations that Trump falsified his company’s records to hide the true nature of payments to Cohen, who paid porn actor Stormy Daniels $130,000 during the 2016 presidential campaign to suppress her claims of an extramarital sexual encounter with Trump years earlier.
Trump pleaded not guilty last year to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and has denied having a sexual encounter with Daniels. His lawyers argue the payments to Cohen were legitimate legal expenses and were not part of any cover-up.
Prosecutors contend Trump’s lawyers caused the evidence problem by waiting until Jan. 18 — a mere nine weeks before the scheduled start of jury selection — to subpoena the U.S. attorney’s office for the full case file.
District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office said it requested the full file last year but the U.S. attorney’s office only turned over a subset of records. Trump’s lawyers received that material last June and had ample time to seek additional evidence from the federal probe, the district attorney’s office said.
Short trial delays because of issues with evidence aren’t unusual, but any delay in a case involving Trump would be significant, with trial dates in his other criminal cases up in the air and Election Day less than eight months away.
The defense has also sought to delay the trial until after the Supreme Court rules on Trump’s presidential immunity claims, which his lawyers say could apply to some of the allegations and evidence in the hush money case. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments April 25.
Trump has repeatedly sought to postpone his criminal trials while he campaigns to retake the White House.
“We want delays,” Trump told reporters as he headed into a Feb. 15 hearing in New York. “Obviously I’m running for election. How can you run for election if you’re sitting in a courthouse in Manhattan all day long?”
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- North Carolina may join other states in codifying antisemitism definition
- Pete McCloskey, GOP congressman who once challenged Nixon, dies at 96
- Feds crack down on labor exploitation amid national worry over fair treatment
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Harvey Weinstein is back in NYC court after a hospital stay
- Kendall Jenner Shares Why She’s Enjoying Her Kidless Freedom
- Washington, DC, police raid on GWU's pro-Palestinian tent camp ends in arrests, pepper spray
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Kim Kardashian Is Now At Odds With Unbearable Khloe in Kardashians Season 5 Trailer
Ranking
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- How Shadowy Corporations, Secret Deals and False Promises Keep Retired Coal Plants From Being Redeveloped
- PGA Championship field to include 16 LIV Golf players, including 2023 champ Brooks Koepka
- Southern Charm Star Madison LeCroy Says This $28 Bikini Gives Your Chest An Instant Lift
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Why JoJo Siwa Says Leaving Dance Moms Was the “Best Decision”
- Judge orders community service, fine for North Dakota lawmaker tied to building controversy
- North Carolina may join other states in codifying antisemitism definition
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property
Cara Delevingne Shares Heartfelt Advice About Sobriety Amid Personal Journey
Woman accused of throwing her disabled son to his death in a crocodile-infested canal
Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
North West joins cast of Disney's 'The Lion King' live concert
Southern Charm Star Madison LeCroy Says This $28 Bikini Gives Your Chest An Instant Lift
Alabama ethics revamp dies in committee, sponsor says law remains unclear